Black Swan (2010)

When I first saw the trailer for this film, it looked like a very interesting yet typical drama type of movie. Though, after seeing the film - there was nothing typical about it at all.

Going into the movie, I tried very hard not to read the reviews. Though I do try to read reviews for the majority of films I plan on seeing, there are some that I prefer to go in "cold turkey" - this was one of them.

(Note: I really enjoy the element of "surprise" for films that really interest me. For me personally, I guess I enjoy this part of the movie going experience).

At first, I thought I had this movie all figured out. From the trailer, I thought I knew what the story was going to be all about. I was wrong. It wasn't what I expected at all. But, in a good way.

Natalie Portman plays the main character, Nina Sayers, an aspiring dancer and ballerina. She is filled with hopes and dreams of someday becoming a famous and great ballerina dancer. And, she worked hard at her craft.

Now, I'm going to be honest here. This is a movie where it's really important to pay attention. It's one of those films where if you miss certain details - they can be vital to the story. It's one of those kinds of movies.

In the beginning, I will admit - it was a bit slow. But, this was important to the story helping to set the tone for the movie. The characters were introduced, the story was set.

As the audience, I felt that I knew what kind of film this was going to be. There were a lot of anticipated moments yet to my surprise - the movie took a dramatic turn.

It was not the movie that I had expected. The characters in the film seemed so predictable. As it turns out, they were not what I had expected at all.

(Note: For those who have seen the film, you'll know what I'm talking about. I'm trying not to reveal too much because I just don't want to spoil it for those who haven't seen the movie yet).

This is really a film about perspective. And, the way we perceive things. Sometimes we may not see things the way others see them. Sometimes we see what we believe. Though, it may not be what others see at all.

As the audience, I felt there were certain parts (as well as characters) in the movie that I had figured out and believed to be true. This is what I saw. As the film progressed, I soon realized this was not the case at all.

This is really a different kind of movie, a unique kind of movie. And, I can honestly say - it wasn't what I expected at all. From the trailer, I was really prepared for a typical, drama type of movie. After seeing the film, it wasn't predictable - it really threw me for a loop.

So many times, I thought I had the film figured out - it really had a lot of twists and turns. There were times where I thought I knew the characters and the storyline only to be surprised by the turn in events.

For me personally, it truly was a very entertaining and unpredictable movie. I enjoyed it very much. It is definitely a movie that I will be watching again.

If you've seen the trailer for this film and it looks even a bit interesting to you, I highly recommend seeing this movie without reading too many reviews.

(Note: There are some reviews that may reveal some details in the film which may reveal too much and may spoil the movie for you).

Film Gurl's 15 Minute Rule: PASS

Happy movie watching!

p.s. Feel free to leave comments on any post either here and/or my Facebook Page. Comments are always welcome, thanks for reading!



Video Link

Hereafter (2010)

"What happens when we die?"

- Hereafter

Going into this film, I knew this was a different kind of movie. Since it's a film directed by Clint Eastwood, I knew this was a movie that was going to have meaning. I was right.

From the very beginning, this film captured my attention. The first couple of scenes were very intriguing and shocking at the same time. As the audience, you see what the characters sees as if you were in the situation yourself.

(Note: I won't ruin it for those who have not seen the movie, but let's just say there are situations depicted in the film where you think will never happen to you but they have to others. It's that real).

In a way, I think there are some who can relate to the film. It kind of makes you think and wonder, will this ever happen to me? For some, it has. And, for others it has not. But, for everyone else - we may know of someone or heard of someone we know where the unthinkable has happened to them. It's real. And, it's true.

The movie starts off by introducing different characters with three separate stories. And, these characters all have lives of their own - all in different parts of the world. But, as the movie progresses they all seem to experience the unknown. And, as fate may have it - all have something in common.

(Note: For those of you who have seen the movie, I thought the way the film unfolded and the way the stories were told were a bit like this movie).

On the surface, this may be a film that is viewed by some as a bit slow. Though some scenes may seem to be unnecessary on the exterior, I feel they added to the general tone and nature of the movie.

This is a movie that involves detail. And, it's one that's definitely important to pay attention to even the smallest things - they will connect and be quite relevant to the movie as it progresses.

I'm going to be honest, this is not a movie for everyone. It is for a much more sophisticated audience - it is a film that makes you think. It it not your typical Hollywood action type movie. It's truly a film that makes you wonder and think about the unknown.

It's a different kind of movie, not everyone will enjoy it. Those who are solely looking to be entertained with lots of action this is probably not for you. But, for those who are looking for a movie with meaning - you will not be disappointed.

As for the end of the film, I think Eastwood did a brilliant job in bringing everything together. If watching the film closely from beginning to end, you will understand the deeper meaning at the end and why he ended it the way he did.

(Note: For those who are Clint Eastwood fans, the movie's musical score is very "Eastwood" like in nature).

If you're in the mood for a different kind of movie with meaning that makes you think, I definitely recommend this one.

Film Gurl's 15 Minute Rule: PASS

Happy movie watching!

p.s. Feel free to leave comments on any post either here and/or my Facebook Page. Comments are always welcome, thanks for reading!



Video Link

The Social Network (2010)

Just recently, I went out and saw this film adapted from the book. Going into the movie, I had already had some background knowledge about the story since I had already read the book. I'm glad I did.

To be honest, this is really a film where you may need some background information about the story. For those interested in the movie, I highly recommend reading the book before seeing the movie. But, why?

The reason being is that the movie is really set in a way to introduce characters and events from the original story. It pans back and forth from present day to the past. And, without having any type of knowledge about the story and the characters one can get confused.

As for the film itself, there are some gaps in the movie as there are scenes presented that may not make sense to someone who is not familiar with the story. In a nutshell, I suggest reading the book before watching the movie to get a better understanding and feel for the story.

Regarding the storyline, I think it played true to the scenes and story presented in the book. Though, it seems like there were bits and pieces left out. With the time limit of film, it's understandable how some elements can be left out of a story.

With that being said, I think this film has a good story to tell. Though, I just feel it could have been done better.

This was not the great story I was hoping for. It seemed a bit jarred with bits and pieces, a little here and there. But, I just did not feel it had the "punch" it needed to be great. When it ended, my initial reaction was - "That's it?" To say the least, I was a bit disappointed.

(Note: For all the fans of the film, these are just my thoughts. To me, the movie just felt it lacked the "punch" to be great. Though, the trailer was done quite nicely).

The one thing that did stand out was the performance from both Jesse Eisenberg, who portrayed Mark Zuckerberg, and surprisingly Justin Timberlake, who portrayed Sean Parker. Both actors portrayed their respective roles superbly. I was very impressed with both of their performances.

Overall, this movie seemed a bit low budget in nature. The story was there but I feel it could have been presented better. At times, it just seemed like they threw in bits and pieces together - I just did not feel that it had enough zing to it. In a way, it seemed like it was trying to tell a story but the story was just not entirely presented in a way that it could have been great -it lacked emotion. It could have been done better.

(Note: For those who have seen the movie, it really reminds me of this movie that was a bit similar in nature. Though, it was not made for the big screen - it was a television type of movie).

If you've been thinking about seeing this film, I recommend it more as a rental. It was "ok," but lacked the punch it needed to be great. If the movie had the same quality and feeling of the trailer, I think it could have been great.

Though, that's the thing - the film lacked the emotion and "punch" it needed to tell a great story. To me, the way the story was told and its presentation was just mediocre in nature.

For those who are really wanting to see the film, I highly recommend reading the book before seeing the movie. And, for those who have been debating whether to see this in the theatre - I recommend it more as a rental.

Film Gurl's 15 Minute Rule: NEUTRAL

(Note: For those interested, check out this entertaining film spoof based on the movie. Enjoy!)

Happy movie watching!

p.s. Feel free to leave comments on any post either here and/or my Facebook Page. Comments are always welcome, thanks for reading!



Video Link

The American (2010)

So, I was all set and ready to watch this film. When I first saw the trailer for the movie, it really looked interesting. From the trailer alone, it felt like a drama and thriller type of film. Since I was so impressed with George Clooney's performance in this movie, I thought this one would be the same. I was wrong.

The beginning of the movie actually started out with a very abrupt scene. It was a bit of a mystery why the types of things happened during this first part of the film. In a way, I guess it was a reason for me to watch more. And, I did.

(Note: For those who have seen the film, you'll know what I'm talking about).

Regarding the film itself, it was a bit of a mystery. There were bits and pieces revealed to the audience, but not everything all at once. At times, it was a bit slow. And, then it would pick up into an action scene or two. But, then it would go back again to the slowness of the film.

In a way, the majority of the scenes really seemed to me like normal, everyday life type of scenes. It definitely was not the drama and thriller type of film that I expected from when I first saw the trailer. To be honest, I think the trailer is a bit misleading - it just doesen't feel like the type of film depicted in the trailer. It's different. And, I'm not so sure if that's a good thing.

All in all, this movie was really slow. Sure, there were some action scenes here and there. But, they were very few and far between. At times, it really dragged. And, I felt a lot of the scenes portrayed the normal things people do in everyday life - it was a bit boring.

Overall, I wasn't too impressed with the movie. It didn't really have that much of a storyline. And, it really dragged at times. The few action scenes in the film didn't really make up for the slowness of the movie. As for the ending, it just wasn't that great.

For those who have been thinking about seeing this film, I'd say - save your money. It's really not worth it in my opinion. I don't even recommend it as a rental.

Film Gurl's 15 Minute Rule: FAIL

Happy movie watching!

p.s. Feel free to leave comments on any post either here and/or my Facebook Page. Comments are always welcome, thanks for reading!



Video Link

Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps (2010)

"If there's one thing I learned in prison it's that money is not the prime commodity in our lives...time is."

- Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps

Recently, I had the chance to see this sequel based on the original movie. And, I have to say - it was definitely a treat to see Michael Douglas playing the role of Gordon Gekko again. But, that's pretty much about all I enjoyed about this film.

As a fan of the first movie, I knew I wanted to see this one. But, somehow when I first saw the original trailer I didn't think it would be as good as the original - I was right.

Though, it did have it's ups and downs. And, yes - there were a few twists and turns with a few very unexpected moments. It really did surprise me.

(Note: For those who have seen the film, you'll know what I'm talking about. It was interesting to see how we were led to believe one thing but it really turned out differently. And, then it changed again near the end).

To be honest, this movie is really a film for those who have an interest in the world of finance. It's really made for those who are knowledgeable about the history of finance and who have followed the financial markets.

For those who are not as interested or knowledgeable about the finance industry, it may be a bit difficult to comprehend - there are many references and terminology used in the film that can only be understood for those who have an interest and knowledge about the topic of finance.

Regarding the film, the story really takes us back to the financial crisis and collapse of Wall Street in 2008. There are many references to the housing market at the time as well as the relationship and role home mortgages played during this period in history.

(Note: Again, this is really a movie for those who follow and have an interest in finance and the history of financial markets. It will be somewhat difficult to understand the references made for those who are not as knowledgeable or interested in the topic of finance).

At the heart of the movie, this film is really about one thing. And, that is greed and the impact greed can play on our society as well as our economy. Then, the question that is posed (as in the original film) remains the same. Is greed good?

Here's what Gordon Gekko had to say about the topic of greed in the original movie:



Video Link

The film really goes into the concept of greed by presenting the events that were a direct result of the speculation and the mania in our financial markets at the time. It really went into the mechanics of how speculation and perceptions can be manipulated to change entire markets - just like the original movie. But, this time - on a bigger scale and with more money.

To add to the story, there was a side story with Gordon Gekko's daughter, Winnie, played by Carey Mulligan, and Shia LaBeouf, which I didn't really care for. It was more of a distraction to the overall storyline than anything else - I didn't really see a need for it.

What I liked about the original movie was the focus on Bud Fox, played by Charlie Sheen, and his interaction and interest to work with his idol, Gordon Gekko. To me, that was what the original movie was all about - the game.

On the other hand, this film went back and forth between the game and the side story with Gekko's daughter. It just didn't make much sense. And, I just did not enjoy the scenes and the interactions in this part of the film.

Overall, I would say this movie is really one for those who have an interest and enjoy the subject of finance and follow the financial markets. It will be really difficult to comprehend some of the references (i.e. events, terminology, etc) in the movie for those who do not have the interest and/or knowledge about financial markets.

(Note: For those who have already seen the film, here's a list of "The 10 Best Quotes" from the movie).

As a fan of the original film, this movie was not as good as the original. But, it did interest me being a fan of the first film as well as having an interest in the subject of finance.

(Note: For those who are fans of Oliver Stone movies, I'd say there's some of his style in the movie. But, there are moments where the film takes on a different style as well. It's very mixed. Some parts do not look as professional as others in terms of editing, acting in certain scenes, etc. For those who have seen the film, you'll know what I'm talking about).

If you're a fan of the original film and also have an interest in finance, I'd say this movie is ok. Not great, but at the same time not the best. If I weren't a fan of the first film and did not have an interest in the subject of finance, I probably would not have enjoyed and understood this movie.

Film Gurl's 15 Minute Rule: NEUTRAL

(Note: For those who are fans of the original film, you're in for a real treat with this sequel. I don't want to ruin it for you but let's just say there's a surprise at one part of the movie - it's very unexpected. That's all I'm going to say!).

Happy movie watching!

p.s. Feel free to leave comments on any post either here and/or my Facebook Page. Comments are always welcome, thanks for reading!



Video Link

Eat Pray Love (2010)

This is a guest post by Clara Mathews.

Putting aside my personal feelings about Julia Roberts and my cynical view of what passes for chick flicks these days, I have finally seen Julia Robert’s big summer chick flicks, Eat, Pray Love. The movie is based on Elizabeth Gilbert’s best-selling novel of the same name. Eat, Pray Love was one of those books that everyone talked about. It was even featured on Oprah’s Book Club. If Oprah likes it, I should like it too. Right?

I still have not read the book, therefore I will try to review the movie with an open mind. Eat, Pray, Love is the diary of Liz Gilbert’s journey of self-discovery. The movie is narrated by Julia Roberts, which is supposed to make it seem more like a personal diary.

The story begins with Liz Gilbert on a bicycle in Bali, on her way to visit a local wise man. Ketut tells her she will have two marriages (one long, one short), lose all her money and will return to Bali one day and he will teach her all of his wisdom.

Back in New York, Liz is a successful author married to Stephen (played by Billy Crudup) a man who apparently changes careers like he changes shirts. They have what many people would consider the perfect life, a beautiful suburban home and they are planning a family. While Liz dreams of visiting exotic places, Stephen considers another career change.

Liz’s growing unhappiness prompts her to pray to God for guidance. I wasn’t exactly clear on the source of her discontent. Liz feels unfulfilled or unhappy or unsatisfied. In my eyes, Liz is simply a woman who doesn’t know what she wants. Perhaps the sudden realization that she was married to a handsome, yet very flaky husband. I have never been married, so forgive my ignorance on how you would not have known this guy was flaky when you married him. At the divorce proceedings, he represents himself - he has one semester of law. Clearly a man who doesn’t know what he wants to do with his life. But he loves Liz and fights the divorce.

Soon after the divorce, Liz becomes involved with David, a cute, young struggling actor, played by James Franco. She moves in with him and adopts his bohemian lifestyle, including meditation and attending his Guru’s ashram. Even though she visits the ashram regularly with David, Liz cannot even follow along with the chanting or get into the spirit of meditation. Then one night, Liz is lying on the floor crying. (As I said, a woman who doesn’t know what she wants).

The very talented, Viola Davis is wasted in her part as Liz Gilbert’s friend and agent, Delia Shiraz. Liz goes to Delia to tell her, she has decided to make a drastic change in her life by taking off for a year to travel. To marvel at life and to be herself, without defining her life by a man. This is where the Eating, Praying Loving begins.



Italy / Eat
Spending four months eating your way through the delicious cuisine of Italy is not bad way to begin any journey. Liz Gilbert rents a run down, old apartment in Rome and embarks upon her journey of self discovery by diving face first into pastas, pizza and gelato with wholehearted glee. Not worrying about carbs, calories or weight gain, Liz hires an Italian tutor, explores the city and makes new friends. In Italy, Liz learns the meaning of “Il Dolce Far Niente” - the art of doing nothing.

India / Pray
After four months of gorging her way through Italy, Liz goes to the ashram of David’s guru in India. The India segment of the movie is slow and fell apart for me. I didn’t understand her desire to pursue meditation, when she clearly didn’t ‘get it” in New York. She scrubs floors and tries to meditate. She meets a Texan played by Richard Jenkins, who is there to unburden himself of years of guilt and the loss of his family. After four months, it is in India that Liz finally let’s go of the guilt she feels about her divorce and bad relationships.

Bali / Love
As Ketut predicted, Liz returns to Bali to learn at the foot of the wise man. She rents an incredible place that looks like paradise. She spends her mornings with Ketut, listening to his wisdom and she finally finds peace in meditation. Who wouldn’t find peace, sitting quietly in one of the most beautiful places on earth? While riding her bike, Liz is run off the road by a car. The car’s driver is Felipe, a Brazilian divorce played by Javier Bardem. Even though both of of them bear the scars of heartbreak and bitter divorces, they eventually fall in love.

Watching Eat, Pray Love left me thinking. Why do people need to travel to far flung places to find themselves? Why would a person who lives in New York City, a place with some of the best restaurants in the world need to travel to find great food? Why, when you are trying to separate yourself from the influence of the men in your life would you travel to India to practice your boyfriend’s religion and return to Bali on the prediction of a toothless old man. If you can afford to take off for a year and travel the world, you don’t have as many problems as you think you do!

Perhaps these are questions that were answered in the book. If you read the book, please leave a comment and enlighten me.

Clara Mathews lives in Dallas, TX with her sock-chasing terrier, where she writes about her love of movies at JustChickFlicks.com and her adventures as a freelance writer at ClarabelaMedia.com. Clara is also a regular contributor to CorporateConciergeInc.com.

Contact Clara at clarabela@justchickflicks.com. Follow her on Twitter @clarabela and Facebook.

Traffic (2000)

(Note: This film is part of my "1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die" project of film reviews).



"No one gets away clean."

- Traffic

Recently, I had the chance to see this film again. This is definitely a powerful movie with an important message.

The basic concept of the film is about the war on drugs, who is involved and what the government is doing about it. What is interesting about the movie is that it shows not just one side of the story but many sides of the story.

We see the viewpoint of those involved on different levels of the law - the highest levels and lawmaker side (such as the role Michael Douglas portrays) and those at the lower levels on the law enforcement side (such as the role Don Cheadle portrays).

Even further, we see the viewpoint from those involved on the other side - the drug business itself. From the highest levels (such as the role played by Catherine Zeta Jones) to the lowest levels of the business - we see from different perspectives.

And, this movie is really about just that - perspective. We say there is a war on drugs. But, who are we really waging this war against?

We think the enemy is a drug warlord who is infiltrating our country and our future. But, the real enemy may not fit that profile. Maybe the real enemy is ourselves - it starts at home.

One of the most powerful quotes in the film was when Michael Douglas said, "If there is a war on drugs, then many of our family members are the enemy. And I don't know how you wage war on your own family."

(Note: For those who have seen the film, you'll know what I'm talking about).

I think this movie had a very strong message. One of the main characters (portrayed by Michael Douglas) thought the way to win the war on drugs was to shut these drug operations down and find those responsible. As the film progresses, we see him trying time and time again to attempt to stop it through the legal process by meeting with other lawmakers and law enforcement agencies.

What he found was this war has and will continue. And, while he was trying to fight the war on drugs - there was another war happening right at home. And, this involved his daughter who ironically became a drug addict.

This really showed him that to win the war on drugs was not external but internal - it starts at home. And, the only way we can win the war is through education and by paying attention to those who matter the most - family.

I think what made this film unique was the way it showed the different perspectives. And, as an audience it was interesting to see multiple sides of the story.

The way the entire film was shot was very interesting. It felt like a documentary style type of movie. And, the whole look of the movie changed when we saw things on the "Mexico" side versus the "U.S." side - it's very interesting.

Overall, I really enjoyed the movie. It is a very serious film on a very serious topic. The way the movie portrays different perspectives to bring it all together really makes it a powerful and brilliant film. At times, I found myself surprised - there are some twists and turns, it is not a predictable movie.

If you're in the mood for a drama type of movie with a powerful message, I highly recommend this one.

Film Gurl's 15 Minute Rule: PASS

Happy movie watching!

p.s. Feel free to leave comments on any post either here and/or my Facebook Page. Comments are always welcome, thanks for reading!



Video Link

The Road (2009)

"In a moment, the world changed forever."

- The Road

Going into this film based on the Pulitzer Prize winning novel of the same name, I had heard really good things about it. So, I decided to check it out.

When I first saw the trailer, it really looked more like an action type movie - it looked like another interesting survival type of film. Now that I've seen it, I would say the trailer is very well done and put together - it really captured my attention.

Though, the film itself really was more of a drama type of movie to me. It was a bit slow - it went back and forth between drama type scenes and actions scenes. Though, I would say the majority of the film was in the drama category.

From the trailer, it looks like a linear type of movie - just dealing with the present. However, the film actually goes back and forth from the past to the present and vice versa. I didn't really expect this kind of format from viewing the trailer.

Regarding the action scenes, some of them were quite shocking - I definitely was not prepared for some of them. I don't want to spoil it for you but let's just say some of the scenes were inhumane in nature.

Basically, the story of the film involves the main character, "The Man" (played by Viggo Mortenson) and his son (played by Kodi-Smit McPhee) as they travel in an effort to survive.

(Note: Also, Charlize Theron plays "The Wife" - she plays more of a minor role in the film).

Along the journey, you find out more about the main characters - their past and struggles. And, you also find out how they got into this situation in the first place. Though, the "how" is not described in much detail.

I think this film has a good story - it definitely had its moments. Though, I feel it just wasn't executed well - it could have been done better.

Instead of an action type of film, it ended up being more of a drama type movie. The majority of the film was filled with drama type scenes - there were very few action scenes.

Overall, this film just didn't do it for me - it felt too slow. I think it could have been done better if there were more action type of scenes - it had a good story. Though, the fact that it dragged for me was a bit frustrating - it needed more momentum.

Personally, I can't really recommend this film - it was more frustrating to watch than enjoyable. If you've been contemplating seeing this one, I'd say its best to pass on it.

Film Gurl's 15 Minute Rule: FAIL

(Note: For all the fans of the film, these are just my thoughts - it just didn't do it for me. Though, I am interested in hearing about the book. For those who have read the book, I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts. Thanks for reading!)



Video Link

Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans (2009)

"Sometimes I have bad days."

- Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans

When I first read about this movie from my tweep's, @ReelTalker, blog post it sounded really interesting. So, I decided to go ahead and check it out.

This was a really interesting but weird film for me at the same time. It started out very "eerie" and then progressed into more of a detective story. Yet, it wasn't an ordinary detective story only about a case. It was a detective story about the detective himself - the "Bad Lieutenant" (played by Nicholas Cage).

Basically, the movie has two stories - the story about the case and the story about the life of the detective (aka the "Bad Lieutenant").

As the film progresses, it shows the dark side of the detective and his ways of coping with his vices and addictions. And, these addictions turn out to be highly addictive in nature. (If you've seen the movie, you'll know what I'm talking about).

There are some scenes in the movie that really had shock value - it's like something that just came out of nowhere. As I watched, I was in awe at some of the actions that the detective took. At one point in the film, it got to be really out of hand - almost to the point where the "Bad Lieutenant" becomes psychotic. (I don't want to ruin it for you, but let's just say there's a lot of "madness" that goes on in this film).

To be honest, this movie really felt like a novel. Basically, it portrayed the life of a detective and his ways of coping with his many vices in life. At one point in the film, it almost made me believe that his vices would destroy him. Though, there was a small twist and change in events at the end, which really did surprise me.

Personally, I really wanted to like this film - I think it had a good story. Though, I just feel it wasn't executed very well.

Instead of a movie, this film really felt like a novel - it just kept going on and on portraying each event as a scene. At one point, I wasn't really sure how they would end it - it just felt like it would keep going on. It lacked focus.

As for the ending, it was more "open ended" - I didn't feel like I got a sense of closure. I felt the story had potential. Though, I feel it just wasn't very well executed and put together. It's like they just kind of threw a bunch of bits and pieces together which really didn't bring things together at the end. It just didn't have that punch.

Overall, I think this film had an interesting story to tell. Though, it just didn't do it for me in the execution. If you've been contemplating seeing this movie, I'd say it's best to pass on it.

Film Gurl's 15 Minute Rule: FAIL

(Note: For all the fans of the film, these are just my thoughts - it just didn't do it for me).

Happy movie watching!

p.s. Feel free to leave comments on any post either here and/or my Facebook Page. Comments are always welcome, thanks for reading!



Video Link

Precious (2009)

"Some folks has a lot of things around them that shines for other peoples. I think that maybe some of them was in tunnels. And in that tunnel, the only light they had, was inside of them. And then long after they escape that tunnel, they still be shining for everybody else".

- Precious

When this film first came out based on the novel, I really had to prepare myself mentally before seeing the movie. That's why I waited awhile to see it. I knew it was going to be a very deep film with an important message. It was.

As I watched the movie, I was in utter shock and horror as to the realism and reality of the abuse portrayed. It was as my tweep, Clarabela, describes - "raw". It just seemed like the main character, Clareece 'Precious' Jones (portrayed by Gabourey Sidibe) lived in a much different world from the rest of us.

It was a world full of hate, jealousy, and cruelty. It was a world unimaginable from the rest of us - so different and so full of violence and hate. The level of abuse in the film, both physical and verbal, was very shocking (to say the least) to see and bone chilling. The part of Mary Jones, Clareece's mother, played by Mo'Nique, really was such a powerful depiction to show the level of abuse in the household.

It was just so hard to imagine seeing Clareece live in this world, and live day to day. She made a good point in the film - she doesen't have the kind of life everyone else has. She never had a chance to just be a kid, have a normal teenage life.

Though, the film questions - what is normal? For Mary Jones, she raised Clareece the only way she knew how. In a way, she thought she was doing the right thing. But, was she?

This then becomes an ethical issue. What is the difference between right and wrong? And, who is to say what is right, and what is wrong? Where is the line drawn?

In Clareece's heart, she knew the abuse from her mother was wrong. Though, she still took it because her mother was her family. She had no family. It wasn't until she had her second baby, and realized she did have a family of her own - one she created, that she knew she had to take care of them. Even if it meant getting away from her mother, who she still did love very much. Clareece had to do what was best for her and her children.

Overall, it was a very powerful and touching film. It really showed the affect abuse (both physical and verbal) can have on children. I would say, the performances of both Clareece and Mary Jones were very, very powerful. It really made me think about the other "Clareeces" and "Mary Jones" in the world. They do exist, though in a world very different than ours.

If your in the mood for a drama type film, I highly recommend this one.

p.s. For those who have seen the movie and may be interested, here are some additional quotes from the film. Thanks for reading!

(Note: For another perspective on the movie, check out the following review from my tweep:

Clarabela - Review Link

Happy movie watching!



Video Link

Brothers (2009)

"There are two sides to every family."

- Brothers

I had the opportunity to see this film recently. Let me just say, it's a very powerful and thought provoking film.

Basically, it's about family and realizing who you are is not necessarily who you will be in the future. There are two brothers, Sam (played by Tobey McGuire) who is the "good son" and Tommy (played by Jake Gyllenhaal ) who is the "bad son."

Now, the movie opens up as Sam goes to pick Tommy up who has been in jail for armed robbery for the past couple of years. Unlike Tommy (aka the "bad son"), Sam is the opposite - he is a military soldier serving his country and devout family man married to his high school sweetheart, Grace (played by Natalie Portman).

Though both Sam and Tommy are complete opposites, they are still family - still brothers by blood. And, because of this they are still bound.

As Tommy is reunited with his family after being release from jail, there is a lot of tension within the family. Mostly due to his conviction and life of crime. Though, they are still family nonetheless.

The turning point in the film was when Sam (who is a Marine) was called to his fourth tour of duty. He knew he would have to go and serve his country - even if it meant giving up his life. I don't want to ruin the movie for you, but let's just say this part of the film was a really life changing event for Sam. (If you've seen the film, you'll know what I'm talking about).

While overseas, Sam witnessed things he never had to deal with being back home. It truly was a life altering experience and had an effect on him thus changing his life forever.

While Sam is gone, Tommy and his family learn to cope with life without Sam. In a sense, life went on. And, in the long run - life had changed. So, when an event takes place after Sam's absence that forces life to go back to how it was before - it could not. The change in events had altered the course of their lives forever.

This is a film about oneself and knowing oneself. It's a very powerful film that makes a bold statement - who you are is not necessarily who you will be in the future. Things change. Life changes. And, people can change - your destiny is not written.

Overall, I really enjoyed the film. It was very powerful and thought provoking. And, I think there are some people who can relate to some aspects of the movie.

If you're in the mood for a drama type film, I highly recommend this one. Check it out!

Happy movie watching!



Video Link

Up in the Air

"To know me is to travel with me."

- Up in the Air

I have to admit, this film didn't really stand out to me when it first came out. I'm not sure what it was - maybe it got lost in all the hype from Avatar. It just didn't capture my attention.

In fact, I didn't even plan on seeing this film. Only when I kept getting recommendations to go see it, that's when I decided to go ahead and check it out. I'm glad I did.

Let me just say, this is probably one of George Clooney's best performances (in my opinion). I really liked the way his character, Ryan Bingham, was portrayed. It really brought out a sense of "realness" to the film. Without going into too much detail (as I don't want to spoil it for you), let's just say I think there may be people who can relate or know someone like his character - it's a very relatable film.

Speaking of "realness," this film was a real eye opener - it really made a statement on the state of the economy today. With many businesses being hit hard financially, it really showed the effect it had on people with all of the layoffs and downsizing. And, the topic of "people" is really at the center of this film - it's what life is all about.

On the topic of "people," there was really one scene I enjoyed. Without going into too much detail, let's just say it was on the topic of technology replacing people. And let's just say, when it all boils down to it - we are people, not robots. There is no replacement for people - it's who we are.

Regarding the film, I really enjoyed the movie overall. It had a great story line - something everyone can relate to. I think the name of the movie really describes what life is all about - the unexpected. If we planned every moment and things always went according to plan, then where would the fun and mystery be?

Sometimes life doesen't always take us to where we thought we would be. Sometimes we end up in the most unexpected places. And, this is what life is all about - dealing with what is dealt to us. Sometimes it could be a good thing, sometimes it could be a bad thing. No matter what happens, it's up to us to make the most of it.

This is a story about life and how we deal with the unexpected. In a way, I think it makes a statement that the unexpected is what life is all about. This is a film that really makes you think - it makes you thankful for what you have today, not for what you might have tomorrow.

If you're in the mood for a drama type movie with a bit of comedy, I highly recommend this film. Check it out!

p.s. If anyone has read the book, I'd definitely be interested in hearing about it. Maybe I'll check it out!

(Note: For other perspectives on the movie, check out the following reviews from my tweeps:

Kelly Whyte - Review Link
Reel Artsy - Review Link
Reel Talker - Review Link

Happy movie watching!



Video Link

The Soloist

Ok, so I heard a lot of good things about this movie and decided to give it a try. Let me just say, this is a very, very serious film. I guess that's why it's classified as a drama. Very serious.

Both Jamie Foxx and Robert Downey Jr. played excellent roles in this film. They were very believable and played true (in my opinion) to their assigned character in the story. The performances alone of both actors is worth watching.

As far as the story goes, this movie is definitely for anyone out there who has had a dream and/or has known someone who has had a dream where things have not gone as planned. It's truly inspiring to see Robert Downey Jr's character, Steve Lopez, attempt to help Nathaniel Ayers (Jamie Foxx), a very talented musician who so happens to be living homeless on the streets as a result of mental illness.

What I like about the story is that it's not predictable - it does not end the way you think it will. While watching this film, I thought the story would basically go in a linear direction - very one sided. To my surprise, it did not. Though, it did end on a positive note inspiring hope to the audience.

It made me think about how many talented people out there can be in the same situation. It sort of reminds me of the movie "With Honors," and Joe Pesci's character, Simon Wilder, who was also homeless but smart and talented as well.

Overall, I thought the performances of Robert Downey Jr. and Jamie Foxx made this a worthwhile movie to watch. Also, it made for a unique story with moments of conflict and drama.

Though, it is a very serious movie. I'd only recommend this film if you're in the mood for a really serious, drama type movie.

Happy movie watching!



Video Link

Cinema Paradiso (1988)

I really enjoyed watching this movie -it was very entertaining from beginning to end. Being a foreign film, I thought it was strictly a drama but was surprised as it had bits of comedy.

It's definitely a movie for filmgoers and filmmakers alike - it brought out my passion for film and the kid in me. Great story, great acting, great music - an overall great movie. I highly recommend this movie - it's a masterpiece.

p.s. For those who have already seen the movie, there is an alternative ending in the director's cut. Enjoy!



Video Link

Raging Bull (1980)

Since I'm a big Martin Scorsese fan, I decided to check out this movie based on the life of Jake LaMotta, a former boxing world middleweight champion.

I liked how the movie was portrayed in black and white - probably to show the sign of the times as it was set in the 1940s/1950s.

Robert De Niro and Joe Pesci were both great - check it out!



Video Link

Changeling

From the trailer, this movie looked interesting. And, no it's not the 1980 scary movie (ha,ha) - different movie. (Though, I've seen that movie and may review it down the road).

The story line of this movie was pretty interesting - it kept my attention and kept me wanting to find out more.

Since the movie was set in the late 1920s/early 1930s, it was great to see how times had been back then - a good period depiction. This movie is more drama with a little bit of mystery. Angelina Jolie did a great job, I think the last drama I've seen her act very well was Girl, Interrupted.

If you like Clint Eastwood movies (he directed this one), you may like this one - it's a good movie with an interesting story line. I'd suggest watching this movie if you're in the mood for drama.



Video Link

Seven Pounds

Video Link

At first, I wasn't quite sure what to think about this movie. It's one of those films where everything comes together at the end - kind of like Memento. It does not follow the traditional formula of how movies are shown - it's kind of unique in a way.

It was a bit slow at first. But, it kept me watching and wanting to find out more - it's very mysterious as you are wondering why Will Smith's character acts the way he does and how the pieces of the puzzle come together. Little by little, things are revealed in the movie. Though, it's not until the end where you find out how everything fits.

The movie is more of a drama, some comedy parts. There's not much action until the end. Though, it tells a very heart warming story.

If you're in the mood for drama and enjoy movies where you have to figure out how the film comes together, this movie is for you.

Revolutionary Road

When I first saw the trailer for this movie, it looked interesting. Why? It looked like something I felt people could relate to, even in this day and age.

Though the film was set back in the 1950s, a lot of the themes and issues still hold true today. Now, I know a lot of people didn't like the film - they thought it was depressing. And, I do admit - it ain't a "feel good" type of movie. Also, alot of people also thought the themes brought up directly attacked the institution of marriage. Personally, I don't think it was an "attack" but a realistic picture of the issues people face in life.

Honestly, I think Sam Mendes did a great job in portraying Richard Yates' novel. What I liked about Mendes, is the way he presented the movie - it was not bias towards any one character in particular.

I think many people can relate to Kate Winslet's character, as well as Leonardo DiCaprio's. Neither the values or wants of either character is better - they are equally important because they are their own. Problem is both of them want different things and in the end - a different life. That is the issue.

After watching the movie, I went out and read the book. It's pretty much the same as the movie. Though, there is more character development - you find more background information about the characters. And, the scenes and the actions of the characters' in the movie start to make more sense. (By the way, I really like Yates' writing style. I'm reading another novel of his, The Easter Parade - it is really good).

All in all, I give the movie a thumbs up. If you want to see a "feel good" type of movie, this ain't the one to watch. Just my $0.02.